I have been lucky to find an HP 8656A and later an HP 8657B in good condition. Both needed a little bit of work, but were in general good shape and now work as good as new (I believe :-)
Other Signal Generators are available, particularly the HP 8640A and B. These are not synthesized but are very clean. They are actually cleaner than most of the synthesized generators, and the 8640B, with the phase lock option, is as stable as a synthesizer. See the plots on John Miles' page.
However, because they are mechanically intensive (particularly the frequency tuning mechanism, which uses plastic gears that tend to break) they tend to develop more mechanical problems as time goes by.
Also, they are not programmable, a feature I was particularly interested in order to develop automated test programs.
The HP 8656A is a Synthesized Signal Generator covering the band from 100 kHz to 990 MHz in 100 Hz steps.
The output attenuator is adjustable from +10 dBm down to -127 dBm. It has AM and FM modulation capability
with accurate modulation/deviation indicators. Modulation can be either internal, using a built-in generator
at 400 Hz or 1 kHz, or an external source.
One of the aggravating features of the HP 8656A is the fan, which runs all the time, unless the instrument
is unplugged from the AC mains.
The HP 8656B is superior to the A model, with smaller step size (10 Hz instead of 100 Hz) and lower phase noise. Residual FM modulation is specified about half that of the HP 8656A. Otherwise, the instruments look the same and are comparable in features, frequency coverage (100 kHz to 990 MHz) and attenuator rating (+10 to -127 dBm).
Both HP 8656 models do not have an RF ON/OFF selection, you turn RF off by setting the attenuator to max attenuation, not exactly the same thing but close enough for most applications.
The HP 8657B is even more improved, with coverage to 2060 MHz, step size of 1 Hz all the way to 2060 MHz, an attenuator rated down to -143 dBm, and much better phase noise and residual FM specification. Also, the fan turns off when the instrument is in standby and it has an RF ON/OFF button (thanks for small favors).
The advantage of the bracket is that if the front connector is banged (like mine was) during shipment or other mishap, the front panel itself will probably be OK.
I have no personal experience with the HP 8657A, but the spec differences with the B model are few (mainly the coverage goes to 2 GHz on the B model, and the A model has 10 Hz minimum step size.) The B model also has a pulse modulator option with pretty good performance, if you are into this sort of things.
All 8656 and 8657 models have a similar construction which gives relatively good access to all boards and components. You will not need special extenders for test and troubleshooting.
Here is a snapshot of the short form specification for the HP 8656B, 8657A and 8657B:
Other features that sets the HP 3586 apart from a *regular* HF receiver are the calibrated power meter, accurate to a dB or so from +20 dBm down to -120 dBm (a very good thing) and a quirky ALC (Automatic Level Control), (not such a good thing) which unlike the ALC on regular receivers, does not operate continuously, but by inserting variable attenuation in the amplifier chain in 5 dB increments. When listening to a signal with fading, the signal level jumps up and down in steps, which makes listening a little harder than on a regular HF receiver.
However, here I am interested in the tracking generator output. Since this output is derived from the same circuits generating the internal oscillators, it is remarkably stable and clean.
All 3 signal generators are available with a high stability reference oscillator, usually an HP 10811 or equivalent. They also have inputs to use an external frequency standard if desired.
For detail led specifications of these instruments, check my Manuals page.
The picture below compares spurs from the HP 3586A (left), the HP 8657B (center) and the HP 8656A (right) at 30 MHz.
For this picture, the instruments were set to 0 dBm and 1.5 kHz apart, around 30 MHz. The outputs were combined at the input of a Tek 494P spectrum analyzer.
Note how the HP 3586A is the cleanest, the HP 8657B is doing a good job, with a little bit of AM noise, and the HP 8656A has significant AM and FM noise.
Another difference between these instruments when used in an automated test setup, the HP 8656A is quite a bit slower when switched to a new frequency, even if the frequency change is very small. The HP 8656B is faster, and the HP 8657B is fastest. The frequency switching speed of the HP 3586 is not specified but seems quite fast, comparable to the HP 8657B.