[MyHosting.com]   [KO4BB Home Page]   [Manuals Home Page]   [KO4BB Wiki]
 

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

test_equipment:precision_z-foil_vishay_resistors [2013/01/08 19:00]
test_equipment:precision_z-foil_vishay_resistors [2013/01/08 19:00] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +===== Precision Z-Foil Vishay Resistors =====
 +
 +//The following was captured from the [volts]nut] mailing list//
 +
 +----
 +
 +The experiments and the following discussion with Vishay took nearly one year, until now I am able to present a final result.
 +
 +Further details about the measurements and the setup will be given later.
 +
 +I now have a personal, thorough understanding of Vishays Z-foil technology and its capabilities.
 +This can also be found between the following lines.
 +
 +'The specification for the hermetically sealed, oil filled metal foil Z resistors (VHP202ZT) imply a usage as a secondary Ohm standard:
 +Longterm stability of 2ppm/6 years and a low TCR of 0.05ppm/K between 0..60°C typically,
 +vanishing @ 25°C, given by a parabola form of resistance over temperature:​ http://​www.vishaypg.com/​docs/​63120/​hzseries.pdf
 +
 +I ordered 5 EA 9k9998 +/- 10ppm, to be trimmed to nominal 10000.00 Ohm +/1 ppm by low ohmic thin film resistors.
 +
 +Vishay always performs measurements on VHP types, i.e. absolute resistance and TCR.
 +
 +So I also ordered the measurement protocol for a small additional charge.
 +The complete batch of resistors were measured by Vishay at 25°C to a precision of about +/- 1ppm, each one 3 times.
 +
 +After delivery, I compared each resistor of the ensemble against each other by a HP3458A.
 +The initial setup was sufficiently stable (order of 1 ppm) to determine the relative resistance deviation, and to fine tune the trimming resistors to the desired precision level.
 +
 +It became apparent during these first measurements,​ that the setup, and the resistors were not as stable over temperature,​ as needed for sub ppm level accuracy, and as expected.
 +
 +First, the measurement setup (i.e. environmental conditions, HP3458A and resistor assembly) was greatly improved to get a verifiable transfer accuracy of < 0.2ppm over one hour, although the HP3458A is not specified in this regard.
 +
 +Each resistor was assembled into an aluminium bar, together with a precision NTC.
 +The bar then is mounted into a small aluminium box, which carries Au plated CuTe plugs to provide 4 pole measurement for the resistor, and 2 plugs for the NTC and case grounding.
 +
 +The different sources of instablities,​ especially thermally induced ones, could then be separated, quantified and reduced.
 +
 +
 +One resistor out of the ensemble was thermally cycled from 25°C to about 0°C, back to 25°C, and then to 60°C and back.
 +As the resistance value at 25°C was exactly reproduced every time to within <0.2ppm, obviously no thermal hysteresis occurred.
 +
 +During the measurement,​ the HP3458A was frequently checked by another VHP202 being at constant temperature.
 +This demonstrated that the instrument stayed stable to within 0.2ppm transfer accuracy.
 +
 +The differential TCR (dR/dT) of the DUT over this temperature range was calculated to be between -0.5 .. -2.6 ppm/K.
 +That is an order of magnitude above the expected, "​typical"​ TCR in the Vishay specification.
 +Also, the upwardly directed parabolum of R vs. T could not be detected, which should be typical for the Z foil technology,
 +according to: "Zero TCR Foil Resistor Ten Fold Improvement in Temperature Coefficient",​ R. Goldstein, J. Szwarc @ Visahy.
 +
 +Coming from the same batch, all resistors have the same T.C.; this was checked briefly for another DUT.
 +This excludes the possibility to improve TCR by a serial/​parallel assembly of 4 resistors.
 +
 +
 +I complained at Vishay PG about the unexpected behaviour.
 +
 +Vishay had made TCR measurements at -55 and +125 before delivery and repeated this on one resistor I had resent them. They found a TCR of -0.4..-0.6ppm/​K.
 +Although they found a similar result, my complaint was completely rejected.
 +They claimed, that this TCR is well within specification.
 +
 +Although most of the datasheets about Z-foil resistors and several other publications about the Z-foil technology imply a more optimistic picture, only in Table 1 of the specification,​ a max. upper limit ('​spread'​) of +/- 2.2ppm/K TCR over the complete temperature range is specified. This is a barn door, 10 times bigger than the typical values over the complete temperature range.
 +
 +Additionally,​ Vishay defines the TCR as a "Chord Slope",​ i.e. as (Rx-R25)/​(Tx-T25),​ not as a differential one.
 +Recalculation of my results then gave a TCR of -0.5 .. -1ppm/K, still very high.
 +
 +Also, the parabolum with vanishing TCR at 25°C, (or at any other center temperature) is "​typical"​ only, and does not have to occur on real components.
 +
 +
 +Conclusion:
 +
 +The ensemble of 5 precision resistors represents a median standard resistance of 10k +/- 1ppm, if thermally stabilized to 25.00°C precisely.
 +
 +The 3458A in combination with this stable resistor ensemble achieves a repeatability / transfer stability of <0.2ppm over 1 hour and an absolute stability of < 1ppm over days for the HP3458A alone.
 +
 +The longterm stability of the ensemble should be less than 2ppm/6 years, which greatly improves the mediocre longterm stability of the internal Ohm reference of the HP3458A.
 +This is to be checked during the coming years.
 +
 +A goal which could not be achieved, is the usage of the VHP202Z resistors as secondary Ohm standards, as the TCR of roughly -0.5ppm/K is unexpectedly too high.'
 +
 +Best regards - Frank
 +
  
 
test_equipment/precision_z-foil_vishay_resistors.txt · Last modified: 2013/01/08 19:00 (external edit)
 
Recent changes RSS feed Creative Commons License Donate Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki
Except as noted, this entire site Copyright © 2002-2017. KO4BB All rights reserved.