This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
— |
precision_timing:allan_variance_challenges_and_opportunities [2013/01/08 19:00] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Allan Variance, Challenges and Opportunities ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:precision_timing:symmetricom_-_allan_variance_-_challenges_and_opportunities.pdf|}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The attached white paper from Symmetricom may be of interest. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Among other things it explains why a common technique is largely a waste of time for tau greater than the inverse PLL bandwidth. | ||
+ | |||
+ | It also indicates that using a bandpass filter centered on the beat frequency really should be used in DMTD systems. | ||
+ | |||
+ | However the associated filter phase shift tempco will require that the filter components have low tempcos and will require elaborate temperature control if analog filters are used. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The best compromise would be to use a high end sound card and use digital filters. | ||
+ | |||
+ | One can then interpolate to accurately time stamp the zero crossings of the bandpass filter signals. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Although this method doesn't make optimum use of the signal samples it will implement a more ideal DMTD albeit with a noise level of around 1E-13/Tau. | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, one is still left with the problem of calibrating the sampling clock. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Bruce | ||