[MyHosting.com]   [KO4BB Home Page]   [Manuals Home Page]   [KO4BB Wiki]

Phase Detectors For PLL Applications

—–Original Message—–

From: microwave-bounces@echo.valinet.com

On Behalf Of Loren Moline WA7SKT


A while back I asked a question about phase detectectors.

Now my question is this. The Macom and other brick PLO's use a different type of phase/frequency detector. Somehow the phase noise is very low on these. All I know is when I listen to a carrier at the IF of my downconverter using one of these PLO's it is a very nice sounding note with no apparent distortion.

Because these PLO bricks do not have a frequency divider it would seem that one could use the same kind of detector to lock our own oscillators.

Has anyone seen a project in which you can build or buy this kind of phase/frequency detector and lock an oscillator every 10 MHz using this standard like the Macom bricks do? And the support loop filter necessary to support such a lock? Thanks!


Thomas, Nx1N answers:

There are two common types of phase detectors. One uses a digital divider to divide the VCO down by some ratio. (This is the basis of DDS systems, BTW.) For example, an 8 GHz VCO divided by 80 gives 100 MHz output. This is applied in to a mixer and a 100 MHz LO. The output of the mixer is filtered, represents phase, and is used to lock the 8 GHz VCO.

There is jitter in the digital division process (going through 7 flip-flops, in this case), and that jitter adds to the normal log(xN??) phase noise of any common multiplier scheme.

The other basic type is a sampling PLL and does not use a mixer. A step recovery diode (SRD) is driven by a 17 dBm to 20 dBm signal at 100 MHz. When the current in the diode shuts off during the negative half-cycle, it creates a voltage spike of perhaps 60 picosecnds in width. That spike is used in a (typically) 2-diode “sampling bridge” arrangement to act as a simple rilly-fast SPDT switch.

Effectively, one end of that SPDT switch is connected to the 8 GHz VCO and the other end to a small capacitor. Because the switch is closed cyclically at a 100 MHz rate (for the above example), it may happen to sample the 8 GHz at the same relative point on its sinusoid. If that is the case, the VCO is in lock with the 100 MHz reference. The “DC” on the capacitor is filtered and used to lock the 8 GHz VCO as for the digital case.

Which form is better? Both methods incur phase noise proportional to the multiplication factor (80x, in this case), based on the log of the ratio. However, the digital divider case adds an additional phase noise contribution from jitter in the divider flip-flops. The actual voltage switching point of each flop's clock input signal is fairly precise, but 'fairly' doesn't cut it, so it adds jitter. You generally will hear less phase noise on the sampled-VCO case, the most common brick lock method.

Thomas, Nx1N

Thomas A. Visel, CTO Neuric Technologies, LLC “We've put some real thought into Artificial Intelligence!”

Didier KO4BB adds:

Actually there is a third type of phase detector, closely related to the Step Recovery Diode Sampling Phase Detector, it is the old fashioned mixer. Like the SRD Sampling Detector, is it an analog phase detector, but it is not as effective when used to sample a high order harmonic of the reference frequency.

The main limitation (or advantage, as shown below) of the sampling phase detector is that there is uncertainty on the harmonic of the signal being sampled, so these detectors are mostly practical when you are trying to phase lock a fixed frequency oscillator, such as a brick oscillator. It is hard to use that method to phase lock a multi-octave VCO (such as a YIG oscillator) for instance. It's been done, such as in the Tektronix 494 Spectrum Analyzer, with significant complexity but excellent phase noise performance compared to a digital synthesizer.

Here is a simple schematic of a sampling phase detector suitable for 0 Hz IF output. SRD is a Step Recovery Diode, D2 and D3 are Schottky detectors:

There are several application notes on Sampling Detectors in my Manuals page


Didier KO4BB

Bill, N6GHZ adds:

Hi Tom,

You described the sampling phase detector very well along with its advantages. Best description I'll heard in awhile.

I would only add that the sampling phase detector was adopted by California Microwave, Frequency West and all the rest since then, after it was well described by Textronix as the key component in their sampling oscilloscopes, introduced commercially in the late 50's, early sixties. The other key ingredient was the invention and commercialization of the SRD by HP a little later (mid 60's).

One other significant advantage of the impulse generator/sampling phase detector combo is the ability to operate at ALL multiples of the impulse frequency (at least up to about 20 to 30% of the width of the impulse). This allows odd multiples like 7, 11, 13, 15 and all the rest. In the 60's through 70's not many digital dividers (actually none that I ever knew of) could be made to duplicate that function.

The other key design feature of the CMI/Frequency West PLO's is the cavity oscillator at L band. If you look at the phase noise of the high Q cavity oscillator by itself, many will be surprised by its outstanding short term stability and low phase noise.

That neat combination of PLL signal source technology is only out done in overall phase noise performance by the double cavity klystron, and we know that device isn't to handy to use in the shack.

I think that will explain, Loren, why using the cavity PLO, like the “brick”, yields a very nice sounding note from your converter.

Regards…Bill - N6GHZ

John, KE5FX adds:

All very true, but don't underestimate what can be done with modern off-the-shelf digital parts. Using a low N-factor in your loop is THE most important factor in PN performance regardless of the technology used. Bricks with N=80-100 have that advantage right out of the starting gate.

A clean VCO is also very important as Bill points out. If the VCO is dirty enough, it will degrade the inband PLL noise substantially. The loop filter is not a brick wall, even though many PLL texts tend to treat it that way.

There's an interesting phase-noise plot near the bottom of the page I posted recently at http://www.thegleam.com/ke5fx/hpll.htm , specifically the light-blue trace (Frequency West brick) and magenta trace (homebrew PLL). This is an 8-GHz PLL built with off-the-shelf components and configured with DIP switches for an 'N' factor of 80, suitable for direct comparison with the brick.

The PLL is as quiet as the brick at offsets below 1 kHz. (The brick appears slightly cleaner, but the difference is small, and within the margin of error for this type of measurement.) Then the brick pulls ahead in the

ham_radio/phase_detectors_for_pll_applications.txt · Last modified: 2013/01/10 19:00 (external edit)
Recent changes RSS feed Creative Commons License Donate Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki
Except as noted, this entire site Copyright © 2002-2017. KO4BB All rights reserved.